| 1 | = Jobcard switches for the Deuterium target = |
| 2 | |
| 3 | In section 8.4.1 of [http://www.uni-giessen.de/cms/fbz/fb07/fachgebiete/physik/einrichtungen/theorie/theorie1/publications/dissertation/buss_diss/at_download/file Oliver Buss' thesis] there are details given on the GiBUU deuterium implementation. The aim of this wiki page is to outline jobcard switches, which are necessary to make use of this implementation. |
| 4 | |
| 5 | First the target has to be adjusted to Deuterium: |
| 6 | {{{ |
| 7 | $target |
| 8 | target_Z=1 |
| 9 | target_A=2 |
| 10 | fermimotion=.true. |
| 11 | $end |
| 12 | }}} |
| 13 | To distribute the nucleons in position and momentum space we can choose between two different wave function models: |
| 14 | {{{ |
| 15 | $deuteriumFermi |
| 16 | waveFunction_switch=2 |
| 17 | ! 1=Bonn |
| 18 | ! 2=Argonne |
| 19 | $end |
| 20 | }}} |
| 21 | Next, we need to define a potential to bind the two nucleons. For this we can't use a mean field, because Deuterium represents a too small system. Instead we use a real two-body potential. Using the parallel ensemble technique, the potential ''V'' for each nucleon in the ''j''th ensemble is given by |
| 22 | {{{ |
| 23 | #!latex |
| 24 | $V=V_\text{2-body}(r_{1,j}-r_{2,j})$ |
| 25 | }}} |
| 26 | where |
| 27 | {{{ |
| 28 | #!latex |
| 29 | $r_{i,j}$ |
| 30 | }}} |
| 31 | is the position of the ''i''th nucleon in the ''j''th ensemble. For the full ensemble method, a Deuterium potential is not yet properly implemented. So we choose for the general input and the propagation routines the following switches: |
| 32 | {{{ |
| 33 | $input |
| 34 | delta_T = 0.025 ! small time step sizes since the two-body potential is stiff and therefore the propagation is sensitive to too large time steps |
| 35 | fullensemble=.false. ! => use parallel ensemble technique |
| 36 | freezeRealParticles=.false. |
| 37 | set_length_perturbative=.true. |
| 38 | length_perturbative=1 ! We don't use perturbative particles, see comments below |
| 39 | ... |
| 40 | $end |
| 41 | |
| 42 | $initDensity |
| 43 | densitySwitch=1 |
| 44 | splineExtraPolation=.true. !Switch for linear spline extrapolation for dynamically calculated density: Extrapolates density between |
| 45 | gridPoints(1)=100 |
| 46 | gridPoints(2)=100 |
| 47 | gridPoints(3)=100 |
| 48 | gridSize(1)=8. |
| 49 | gridSize(2)=8. |
| 50 | gridSize(3)=8. |
| 51 | $end |
| 52 | |
| 53 | $propagation |
| 54 | delta_P=0.01 ! Delta Momentum for derivatives |
| 55 | DerivativeType=2 ! 1=first order Range-Kutta, 2=second order Range-Kutta |
| 56 | predictorCorrector=.true. ! Whether to use a predictor/corrector algorithm to do the propagation |
| 57 | $end |
| 58 | |
| 59 | $baryonPotential |
| 60 | EQS_Type=7 ! => Two body potential for deuterium |
| 61 | DeltaPot=1 ! Switch for potential of spin=3/2 resonances |
| 62 | ! 1=nucleon (spin=1/2) potential times 3/5 [according to ericson/Weise book] |
| 63 | ! 2= 100 MeV *rho/rhoNull |
| 64 | symmetriePotFlag=.false. ! Switch for the assymetry term in the nucleon potential |
| 65 | $end |
| 66 | |
| 67 | $Yukawa |
| 68 | yukawaFlag=.false. !decides whether Yukawa is switched off(.false.) or on (.true.) |
| 69 | $end |
| 70 | }}} |
| 71 | |
| 72 | |
| 73 | Oliver prefers not to use perturbative particles with Deuterium, since there is no unperturbed nucleus left if there is a nuclear reaction in deuterium. So he chooses |
| 74 | {{{ |
| 75 | $low_photo_induced |
| 76 | ... |
| 77 | realRun=.true. ! => reaction products are set into real particle vector |
| 78 | $end |
| 79 | }}} |
| 80 | |
| 81 | |